By Charles Mousseau

updated 1:03 p.m. ET Sept. 22, 2005

There's a reason that conventional advice is called “conventional,” and it's related to the same reason that obvious plans are considered “obvious” — they are ultimately effective.

I, ever the contrarian, always have looked off the beaten path to find ways to improve my poker success. Not just those that are different for their own sake, but those that I feel are effective, ones I can integrate into my own play, and they just haven't been talked about by big-name authors.

I'll leave the mainstream advice to the mainstream authors, but if you are curious, here are the best five things I do to help my tournament success that no one, to the best of my knowledge, has discussed.

No. 1: Watch a few hands unfold at your table from a different physical location.

You hear athletes and poker players alike talk about a situation known as “being in the groove.” You're almost seeing things before they happen, letting intuition take over the micromanaging so you can start absorbing things in the big picture.

It can be very effective, but the danger is this: It isn't a big step from being “in the groove” to being “in a rut.”

To combat this, I have developed a little trick which I first used back in my chess-playing days, where for a few of my opponent's turns, I would stand behind him and observe the game “from a distance,” in an effort to force myself to see the game not just as my game, but simply, a game.

The next time you are at the poker table, and you're going to get up and go for a stretch, or to get a soda, stand back from the table and watch the action. Pretend you aren't even involved. When they're about to deal, sit down and get your cards, play the hand if it is worthy. When you're out of the hand, stand back up. Walk around and watch.

This helps you with your viewpoint, both in the figurative and in the optical sense. By standing up, you might be able to see things that an obstruction would otherwise prevent, such as one player having a lot more chips than you thought, or someone else acting generally irritable under certain circumstances. It might help you down the road.

Even without such a revelation, the forcing of the point of view from your table to a generic table and back again can help keep you fresh and observant, two things crucial to succeeding in a poker tournament.

No. 2: Track one highly specialized statistic from tournament to tournament.

Most internet poker sites offer the ability to track general stats about how often you call in certain positions. I've never seen how these can be useful, except in the most abstract of senses, because of the amount of extrapolation required beyond just the number. Seeing the flop 50 percent of the time only tells you that you've seen the flop half the time, but says nothing about why you have done so, and there's something worse as well:

How do you put a goal to that? What percentage of flops, all things equal, do you want to be seeing? Again, it is very, very difficult to answer this without answering a lot of assumptions beforehand.

If you are going to track a statistic in poker, then track one that has some specific and immediate value, and one that has a goal for comparison purposes. Change it from time to time as you focus on different areas of the game you would like to analyze more closely.

Most recently, the statistic I have been tracking involves how often I make an egregious overbet preflop (say, a raise to over 10 times the big blind), how often I get called, and how often I have a big edge (at least 3:2 by my definition).

So far, in the past 12 times I have made such a bet preflop, I have gotten action on 11 of them. One of those times I was only an 11:9 favorite (when I ran my queens into ace-king), and the other 10 featured me being at least a 3:2 favorite.

The reason I came about tracking this statistic was when I made a sizable reraise preflop with pocket kings, and the original raiser had aces. Although in retrospect I didn't see how I could play that differently, it did suggest to me that I should focus on this, as I was curious if I was overplaying hands preflop too much. I can look back on this percentage and see that I have been making a healthy profit with my haphazard-looking preflop play. This is because I have been careful about who I make such a play against, which of course segues nicely into our next bit:

No. 3: Categorize the other players by first focusing on them as “opportunities”

In no-limit hold’em, as I've said in the past, the name of the game is "opportunity," as opposed to "efficiency" in limit hold’em. In limit hold’em tournaments, I do something very analogous, and I think about each player in terms of how I would play a hand against them in the most efficient manner. A player who always tries a river bluff if you raise the flop and check the turn, for instance, gives a strong suggestion on the most efficient way for me to play my medium-strength holdings. A player who will check-raise the flop and bet the turn with as little as top pair will be the one against whom I bet out my big made hand on the flop.

MORE FROM POKER

Choosing poker over college pays off for Cada

Choosing poker over college pays off for Cada Discuss on Newsvine: Sound off on poker Know how to hold 'em: Tips and terms   Add Poker headlines to your news reader: