Skip navigation
Listen now:
NBC Sports: The Jon Stashower Show

Stern's vision for younger Olympics not what it seems

Is NBA's commissioner pushing for an NBA-branded event like World Cup?

Image: David SternGetty Images
NBA Commissioner David Stern might be in favor of making the Olympics a younger basketball event, but that might not apply to all summer basketball if it includes NBA players.

It starts Sunday against France.

The greater question is whether it also is the start of the end.

For a three-week period in London, we will get an opportunity to experience what David Stern seemingly no longer wants you to see: veteran NBA stars competing in the Olympics.

Initially, Stern came off as someone championing the greater good, that by limiting Olympic basketball competition to players 23 and younger, as men's soccer does, the NBA's stars no longer would feel quadrennial pressure to represent their county, United States or otherwise.

With the NBA willfully enabling the one-and-done pipeline from college, a 23-and-under edict essentially would open a single Olympic opportunity to those interested. Then they could move on with their summers.

But as with so many things Stern, the objective was veiled.

Apparently, it would only be an Olympic objective, not a basis for all international competition.

Not only does Stern's greater view of the greater good apparently still include ageless participation in the World Championships, the event played in even-year, non-Olympic years, but a rebranding of those World Championships to an NBA-branded World Cup of Basketball.

And that changes everything.

Because that wouldn't be about conserving the best of basketball for the NBA calendar, but rather for the NBA's financial gain.

ProBasketballTalk
Image: U.S. Olympic basketball player Kevin Durant challenges Argentina's Luis A. Scola during exhibition game in Barcelona
Team USA's win hardly dream-like
On a day when the U.S. men's basketball team wore throwback uniforms from 1992, it beat Argentina by just six points in an exhibition. Gold won't come easily.
It is an approach that sits better with ownership, because they essentially would be getting their own very-much-for-profit Olympic-style tournament. In that case, if fatigued players, or even injured players, do return for the NBA season, then at least ownership would have been able to monetize their investments.

Why there hasn't been an uproar from the players' association is beyond us, unless their take from such a World Cup of Basketball would equal the current 50-percent take from the new collective bargaining agreement.

As with the Olympics, participation in such a World Cup of Basketball would be voluntary. In the owners' perfect world, it also would come without pay. But it's one thing to devote an offseason to patriotic pride in the Olympics, another to wear national colors while profiting NBA's coffers.

So does that mean LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade and Kevin Durant would receive the same $200,000 (give or take) per game they receive during the NBA season?

It would be interesting to see how strong the NBA's commitment to such an international, NBA-branded world championship would be if it also included scale salary for all those involved.

For now, the offseason belongs to the players. While the collective-bargaining agreement includes certain prohibitions, and contract riders include others, such as skydiving and motorcycle riding, the non-NBA months are the players' months. Yes, league approval has to be received to participate in offseason charity games, but NBA banning Olympics participation would have to be written into the CBA. Beyond that, what if a player is a free agent, could he then be banned under an NBA 23-and-under Olympic rule, since he technically would not be in the NBA at the time?

On the face of it, a 23-and-under rule makes sense under an NBA calendar that barely affords three months away from the game when counting the full breath of the playoffs and then early starts to training camp for teams with overseas preseason schedules.

It used to be that the only time you could witness such assemblages of All-Stars was on a Dream Team. Now you can find them on the Heat and the Thunder and the Lakers and even on the Clippers and the Nets.

Dream Teams these days are being featured annually, USA Basketball no longer required to recruit such quadrennial combinations.

The basketball world is changing, in a large part because of what Stern has accomplished under his stewardship. Make no mistake, with the loaded rosters of the Heat, Thunder, Lakers, Clippers, Nets and perhaps even Knicks, it could be argued that this coming season's television schedule will be its own World Cup of Basketball.

Kansas City Royals v Boston Red Sox
Getty Images
The Week in Sports Pictures

The nation grieved for those hurt, killed and affected by the Boston Marathon bombings. After one of the suspects was caught on Friday — following a day-long lockdown and manhunt — sports returned to Boston over the weekend.

When Stern first broached the 23-and-under soccer-like notion for the Olympics, it made sense because the NBA product is now at its own world-class level. The NBA doesn't need to emulate the World Cup because when it comes to basketball, it is its sport's pinnacle, with a burgeoning international cast.

Is there anyone who doubts that the annual NBA champion could defeat any national team beyond that of the United States', even with Sunday's pre-Olympic exhibition struggle against Argentina?

Amid pushback from some of the current national-team members, most prominently Kobe, Stern has softened the stance, the eve of the Olympics hardly the best time to champion such a position.

"I said that after 20 years, it's time for the owners to sort of think about what other options there might be," Stern said after the recent Board of Governors meeting in Las Vegas. "I didn't stake out a position. I said one option is what soccer does, what you Americans call soccer, you know, which is 23 and under.

"There are all kinds of other options, as well. So based on that, I think Kobe is right. Maybe it is a stupid idea and soccer is stupid. But we should see how that works out."

If Stern wants to champion 23-and-under as a way to keep his league strong, have his players ready, keep his stars revitalized and rejuvenated, then we have no issue.

But if Stern is advocating 23-and-under for the Olympic merely as a way of furthering the NBA's profits, then his players have every right to challenge such an approach.

Because if they're going to be playing solely for honor, and not for profit, then they at least should benefit by being part of the Olympic village, of a spectacle greater than NBA ownership self-indulgence.

Ira Winderman writes regularly for NBCSports.com and covers the Heat and the NBA for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. You can follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/IraHeatBeat.

© 2012 NBC Sports.com  Reprints

advertisement
Video: NBA from NBC Sports
Indiana Pacers v Miami Heat - Game One
NBAE/Getty Images
Reason for optimism after Game 1 loss?
PBT Extra: The Heat snuck past the Pacers in the final seconds of overtime in Game 1, and PBT’s Kurt Helin breaks down where the Pacers can go from here. Paul George had a monster game, and Helin believes the Pacers have a real chance at upsetting the top-seeded Heat.

Slideshow
Denver Nuggets v Golden State Warriors - Game Three
  Get your NBA cheer on
Check out some of the dancers from the NBA.

more photos