Getty ImagesWhen did athletes stop saying, "I'm going to give 110 percent today?" As anyone over the age of 30 will likely remember, that was the go-to pre-game cliché of the 1970s and 80s, uttered nearly as often as the eternal "We're going to take it one game at a time." Maybe somewhere along the line a jock accidentally wandered into an arithmetic class and discovered that, for decades, he and his buddies had been wasting their time trying to do something that was mathematically impossible.
Sports clichés, which are mouthed with a faintly bored and professionally tolerant thousand-yard stare by everyone from NFL linemen to the teen phenoms of the WTA, are dull and exasperating in equal measures. But they have their uses. They rob opponents of bulletin-board motivational material. They keep the athlete from having think too much about what he or she is doing on the court—always a good thing. And, except in the case of giving 110 percent, they're incontrovertibly true. No matter how good you are, you really only can take it one game at a time.
From my perspective on the other side of the pressroom, the most important function that an eye-glazing cliché performs is this: It doesn't make news. Reporters were constantly frustrated by the perceived dullness and lack of depth of Pete Sampras. He wasn't introspective by nature, but in public he also wasn't introspective by choice. As most athletes eventually learn, being interesting to the press isn't worth the trouble. It only becomes a distraction. The problem with a memorable quote is just that — people remember it, which means they're going to ask you about it. Again. And again. And again. That means you're going to spend energy explaining what you meant the first time.
At 28 years old, after a decade on tour, you might think Nikolay Davydenko would know all of that by now. But this year's Australian Open has given the unassuming and dryly self-deprecating Russian access to a whole new universe of attention. With two wins over Roger Federer and the tentative favorite status they've earned him, people are suddenly listening to him when he speaks. As Davydenko said in his presser after his second-round win, when he was asked what he would tell his children he did for a living after he retired, "It's interesting. We've not talking about tennis. We're talking about my life. This is my first experience like this in the press."
Everyone laughed. To reporters, Davydenko's unpredictable mix of honesty and ironic bravado is disarming and refreshing after all the safe clichés they've had to endure. But underneath the laughter, we smell blood. That was obvious right from the start yesterday, when the second question Davydenko heard was, "Did your opponent look scared?"
This was in reference to a remark he had made after his first-round win. When he was told that Andy Murray and Rafael Nadal had said they thought he could win the tournament, Davydenko answered, in his usual hyper, Yoda-esque English, "Oh, really? Surprising, you know, these guys start to talking about me, because maybe now. Before, if nobody talking, then nobody scare. Now it's everyone scare. ... But it's interesting feeling. Now I feel like I can beat everyone."
Two questions after that one, Davydenko was asked, "Do you enjoy scaring people?" It was official: "scared" was the word of the tournament, and Davydenko's quote was going to get around.
|
Using those words instead would have been safer and smarter. If you were in press-conference school, you'd almost certainly be coached to phrase it that way. But Davydenko, while he's way too honest and unpretentious to trash talk in the classic sense, is a witty guy who'd rather have fun than play it safe with his words.
The United States swept favored Switzerland out of the Davis Cup on Saturday when Mardy Fish and Mike Bryan beat Roger Federer and Stanislas Wawrinka 4-6, 6-3, 6-3, 6-3.
Slideshow |
more photos |
Slideshow |
NBCSports.com |