Skip navigation
Listen now:
NBC Sports: Amani & Eytan

NCAA let Rose play, so why punish Memphis?

School shouldn't lose wins because player was retroactively ruled ineligible

Image: RoseGetty Images
Just because Derrick Rose missed some mail isn't reason enough to rule him ineligible, writes Mike DeCourcy.

Mike DeCourcy
It is not uncommon for history to be altered after it is written. Pluto once was considered a planet but now is not. Harry Truman left office with an approval rating in the low 20s but eventually became the model of the modern Democrat. Jim Rice was not deemed worthy of baseball's Hall of Fame for 14 years, and then he was.

Villanova in 1971, UCLA in 1980 and Ohio State in 1999 all competed in the NCAA Final Four, but they no longer are considered Final Four teams.

So the NCAA infractions committee's decision to vacate Memphis' accomplishments from the 2007-08 basketball season is not without precedent. And yet it appears to be unprecedented.

Because out of all the previous Final Four teams that have disappeared into history's dumpster, none arrived there with an arm of the NCAA serving as an unwitting participant in the transgression.

Before Derrick Rose could play basketball at the University of Memphis, the NCAA eligibility clearinghouse examined his academic records, including his standardized test score, and determined they met the minimum standards for eligibility to compete as a freshman.

Memphis accepted this verification and used Rose as the team's point guard in 40 games, 38 of which the Tigers won, including five in the NCAA Tournament.

A little more than a month after Rose missed a free throw that might have clinched the NCAA championship for the Tigers, the Educational Testing Service cancelled Rose's qualifying SAT score, technically rendering him ineligible to have played in that game.

Thursday, we were told two things about this transaction by NCAA infractions committee chair Paul Dee.

"When you have a situation where information is not known at the time, and information appears to be valid on its face, then I assess no blame. Because the score was cancelled after the fact, it's hard to say that anyone could have foreseen that would happen."

This was his response when asked about the apparent inefficacy of the clearinghouse that approved Rose's eligibility.

"The matter of initial eligibility is one of the NCAA rules where there is strict liability. Not infrequently, we find that information comes to light after a student/athlete has participated. For example, if a student/athlete becomes a professional ...

"If the student/athlete is academically ineligible, the penalty is related back to the time."

This was Dee's response when asked how Memphis could be punished for unknowingly utilizing an ineligible player.

This outrageous double standard leaves Memphis with an historic season that has been erased from history. The NCAA has ordered the school to remove any banners or signs that acknowledge the 2008 Final Four trip and to remove any recognition of the 38 victories from its media guide and other publications. It even declared coach John Calipari will have the 38 wins removed from his career record.

The university, to its credit, defended itself against the allegations at a June hearing and tried to fend off the vacating of its records. An appeal is planned. There is a financial component to the penalty for Memphis — having to return the money it earned for participating in the tournament — but Calipari has moved on to Kentucky and Rose now plays for the Chicago Bulls. Many schools in Memphis' situation would have accepted this punishment so long as there were no serious sanctions affecting future teams.


advertisement
More news
World Select Team v USA Junior Select Team
NBAE/Getty Images
Welcome to Kansas

CBT: Kansas commit Andrew Wiggins impressed in his first workout with the Jayhawks.

Big East Basketball Tournament - First Round
Getty Images
CBT: Murdock still seeks compensation from Rutgers

Former Rutgers staffer Erik Murdock is still seeking compensation for his termination and says he confronted his co-workers about Mike Rice's behavior.

College basketball videos
Rutgers AD has no recollection of abuse
DPS: Craig Wolff of the Newark Star Ledger discusses the details of the allegations against Rutgers AD Julie Hermann with the DPS crew. She says she does not remember the abuse, even an incident in which she was caught on videotape.

Slideshow
Northwestern State v Florida
  Three cheers for college hoops
Take a look at cheerleaders in action from around the country.

NBCSports.com

Detroit Tigers v Minnesota Twins
Getty Images