Skip navigation

NCAA sanctions won’t impact Oklahoma

Penalties don’t impact Sooners’ title chances, just some embarrassment

Video: Football from NBC Sports
Pitt prepared for aggressive Irish attack
Nov. 11: Pittsburgh head coach Dave Wannstedt says he expects Notre Dame to rebound after recent setbacks and come out strong.

Special feature
Ohio State v Penn State
Predictions 101: Ohio State to roll, N.D. to win squeaker
Stanford will stun Southern Cal again, while No. 4 TCU will dominate.

NBCSports.com

Slideshow
North Carolina v Virginia Tech
  College cheer
Check out some of the college football cheerleaders from across the country.
OPINION
By Tom Dienhart
updated 9:39 p.m. ET July 11, 2007

Tom Dienhart
Bummer Sooner?

Hardly. It's Boomer Sooner after reading this verdict.

The NCAA brought down the hammer on Oklahoma today for not properly monitoring the employment of its football players.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

And I don't see a dent. OK, maybe a small one.

NCAA headquarters broke down its penalties in detailed minutiae. It was a long, winding dissertation that looked imposing and sounded frightening in parts.

But, after reading and rereading the manifesto, I concluded this about the pair of handcuffs the NCAA slapped on the Sooners: They are lined with velvet.

Here are a few highlights of the sanctions, which go on top of several others the school already self-imposed in anticipation of this day:

Extend by two years an already-existing probation (it'll end in May 2010).

Cut two scholarships in 2008-09 and 2009-10.

Vacate all wins from 2005.

Suffer the indignity of the always dreaded "public reprimand and censure." Again, I ask: What's the big whoop?

Many seem up in arms over the fact OU must vacate its eight wins from 2005. This penalty was summed up best by a poster on SoonerScoop.com: That's like me stealing a pizza and eating it -- and then the cops telling me I didn't eat the pizza.

In the end: Vacating a few wins stinks, but it won't destroy the program's ability to continue to compete. And, really, isn't that what NCAA penalties are supposed to do?

But I don't see these NCAA shackles slowing down the Sooners. Heck, I still envision OU as a national power this fall and in coming years, too.

Slide show
Image: AEK Athens' Nemeth reacts after a Europa League soccer match against BATE Borisov in Athens
  Week in Sports Pictures
Flying on the hardwood, racing on the rink, getting physical on the gridiron, and much more.

more photos

Now, if the NCAA really wanted to hurt a school, it would take away more scholarships. (Ask Alabama what that's like.) Losing two scholarships for a couple years is no big deal for OU. Almost every team has four or five schollies that float about each year, usually going to walk-ons or sitting unfulfilled after players quit the team or flunk out.

And if the NCAA wanted to be especially nasty, it would make a school forfeit future TV revenue/appearances or impose a bowl ban. But the NCAA doesn't have the guts to do that to a national heavyweight school. (Not that Oklahoma's infractions merited that type of punishment.)

No, these penalties remind me of an old joke: The NCAA was so mad at (fill in the blank elite school), it slapped Cleveland State with two more years of probation.

In the end, Oklahoma will suffer a little public embarrassment, be the brunt of a few wisecracks from Texas fans in Dallas ... and march on as a college football power.

In fact, I can see Bob Stoops using this as a way to motivate his team to win the Big 12 this fall.

© 2009 Sporting News

Sponsored links