Lefty supports Tiger in size of new tournament

updated 8:48 p.m. ET March 14, 2007

ORLANDO, Fla. - Rivals on the golf course, Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson sounded like allies Wednesday in promoting the concept of Woods’ new tournament in Washington being treated like an invitational.

The field size for the new AT&T National has caused a great divide on the PGA Tour, the lines drawn between prestige and opportunity.

PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem suggested that the tournament likely would be considered an invitational, similar to events hosted by Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer, which have reduced fields. Some players have argued that the tour should not make the event exclusive, which would take away spots in a season already made shorter by the FedEx Cup.

“We’re trying to put on the best possible field and the best tournament we possible can, and I think ultimately that’s what we’ve decided on,” Woods said Wednesday, his first comments since the flap became public last week in Tampa, Fla. “Field size is still up in the air. It’s not finalized yet. But we are certainly looking at a reduced field.”

Woods said Finchem had already talked informally with players on the policy board.

Left in the dark were members of the 16-man Players Advisory Council, such as Rich Beem, who said in an interview last week that the idea of a smaller field was “insulting.”

“I think it’s great that Tiger is involved and we’re going to Washington. We need that,” Beem said. “But we’re trying to get back more spots throughout the year, and all of a sudden we have a limited-field tournament? It’s the most totally wrong thing I’ve heard of in a long time that’s sticking in to the players.”

The PAC scheduled a conference call for March 28 to discuss the field size.

Special coverage Complete coverage of Woods’ life and career

Mickelson said he has tried to stay out of “tour politics” the past few years, but quickly rose to Woods’ defense. He said it was important for the tour to be in the nation’s capital, and important for the tour to have a strong relationship with Woods.

“And that tournament does both,” he said.

Mickelson has long argued against opposite-field events held the same week as World Golf Championships, saying the tour has to subsidize purses to give lower-ranked players a chance to earn money. The tour already has three conflicting events, and plans another one next year in Puerto Rico.

“All of the conflicting events cannot support themselves financially, and all of the excess revenue from the tour goes to support those tournaments, and most of that money is driven by Tiger,” Mickelson said. “So if you’re looking at 450 spots that Tiger is creating, and if he wants to take 20 away because he wants to have a prestigious event, I think we should not, as players, be narrow-minded.”

MORE FROM GOLF

Golf Section Front

Thanksgiving weekend, minus the Skins Game McIlroy, McDowell give Ireland lead in World Cup Out of Bounds: Tiger booed ... at Stanford? Latest golf videos Latest player news, rumors and more Tracking Tiger: News, features and more Tiger's triumphs: Recapping all Woods' wins Vote: When will Tiger win his 15th major? Vote, discuss: Best major of 2009? Special section: Golf on NBC Golf Section Front   Add Golf headlines to your news reader: